The situation in Mexico has serious consequences for our Rights, and even our lives here in AZ and all along the Mexican border. We cannot emphasize enough how much it is in our interest to have a free, safe and prosperous Mexico as our neighbor. Many of us have family, friends there and they are our neighbor.

We strongly support the Human Rights of the Mexican people to be able to defend themselves. That means the Mexican people should once again have the rights and resources to possess, bear and use modern and effective firearms. As over 70 years of corrupt federal government and it's attending gun control have shown, the bumper sticker is so true. "If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns". Mexico is a textbook example of the failures of gun control. While some very limited firearms are permitted on paper, and in practice, the real effect has been to disarm the good people of Mexico.
That was done by the very corrupt political party that ran a country rich in natural resources and people, into the ground to prevent a revolution, not to "control crime" as was the pretense.

As the archived reports will show, the defenseless people of Mexico have suffered way too much. They deserve much better. We need to help.

Given the gravity of the ongoing drug war in Mexico our neighbor to the south, ASR&PA has been working to monitor the border situation and it's many effects on our state and our members:

Including drug and human trafficking, with related issues of murders, kidnappings, home invasions, extortion, destruction of wildlife habitat, illegal immigration, white slavery, money laundering, expenses of incarceration and medical treatments, the list goes on and on. Also de facto cession of areas of the state to the DTO's; fugitives, cash, firearms and ammunition running south. Most of these issues could be significantly reduced by simply securing the border.

To get it out of the way, ASR&PA does support legal immigration, trade, and travel between our countries. Especially so that we and our Mexican neighbors can once again freely and safely travel to our neighboring countries for competition, training, hunting and just enjoy good company.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

AZMEX UPDATE 2-12-07

AZMEX UPDATE 2 DEC 2007

December 2, 2007 - 11:52PM

'Coyote' wars move to Valley
MIKE BRANOM, TRIBUNE

Rival gangs of human smugglers no longer battle for supremacy on busy
freeways. The fight has come to quiet residential streets.

Like any trade involving illicit contraband, violence always has
surrounded the trade of smuggling illegal immigrants into the United
States. With "coyotes" continually scheming to eliminate competitors
and steal their lucrative cargo, the crackle of gunfire often broke
the silence of the desert.

But after successful interdiction efforts on Arizona's highways,
police and prosecutors say they now are seeing more crimes committed
in the Valley.

"If you're an innocent person living in a neighborhood where there's
a drop house, you have reason to be concerned," said Arizona
Department of Public Safety Lt. Fred Zumbo, an immigration
enforcement expert.

Phoenix police recently touted a successful investigation into
kidnappings and extortion attempts stemming from human smuggling. In
this instance, the crime scenes were single-family homes.

According to authorities, smuggler Luis Armando Camacho-Pasos showed
patience in destroying a rival gang.

He went to Mexico, approached a coyote and posed as an illegal
immigrant needing help to cross the border. Once stashed in a west
Phoenix drop house in June, Pasos told the smugglers to meet his wife
nearby, where she would pay the remainder of his fee.

But there was no wife, and there certainly wasn't any money. Instead,
Pasos' armed gang jumped the other smugglers, seizing the competing
ring's "cargo," taking their captive immigrants to their own drop
house and then extorting money from them.

In 2006, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Arizona
investigated 100 calls in which migrants were held hostage, usually
while coyotes were squeezing them for more money.

But ICE spokesman Vinnie Picard said the agency does not track how
many cases specifically relate to one group of smugglers overtaking
another.

Pasos was brought to justice after an illegal immigrant escaped and
called police. Last month, he was sentenced to 15 years in prison for
kidnapping and weapons violations.

"These are very dangerous crimes taking place within our community,"
Phoenix police spokesman Sgt. Joel Tranter said. He estimated that
city's authorities respond to smuggling-related kidnapping calls on a
weekly basis.

Why these incidents are taking place within the Valley can be found
in the wreckage of two bullet-riddled and blood-drenched vehicles
along Interstate 10.

On the same day in November 2003, coincidentally, that Mexico's
president visited Phoenix, a group of bajadores — bandits ripping off
other smugglers — commandeered a pickup filled with illegal
immigrants northwest of Tucson. But one of the original smugglers
escaped and called his compatriots in Phoenix, who came to his aid.

The first group eventually caught up with the bajadores near Casa
Grande and opened fire.

The toll: four dead, five wounded and four arrested.

A similar incident took place in rural Pima County earlier this year,
with three killed.

In response to the mayhem, DPS fought back earlier this year with
"Operation Full Court Press," which Zumbo described as a thorough
interdiction effort along the border and on major traffic arteries
heading into the state. Scores of arrests followed.

"But it's like a big chess match, in that we do something and then
they counter it," Zumbo said. "So, they've countered it by not using
the main highways."

AZMEX UPDATE 20-11-07

AZMEX UPDATE 20 NOV 2007

Border disharmony: Congressman, TV newsmen inspect river
By Jonathon Shacat
Herald/Review

Published on Tuesday, November 20, 2007
PALOMINAS — U.S. Rep. Raul M. Grijalva toured the ongoing border
fence construction project at the San Pedro Riparian National
Conservation Area on Monday to raise awareness for his proposed
Borderlands Conservation and Security Act.

Grijalva, representing Arizona's 7th Congressional District, and
fellow Democrat Gabrielle Giffords of the 8th District are the only
two of Arizona's eight U.S. representatives whose districts abut the
U.S.-Mexico border. Giffords' district includes all of Cochise County.

Glenn Spencer, left, of the American Border Patrol, has some issues
with U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva, right, as the 7th District Congressman
visits the San Pedro River near Palominas and Spencer's property on
Monday. Tucson television newsman Bud Foster of Channel 13, center,
listens. (Ed Honda-Herald/Review)
Grijalva observed portions of the border fence and listened to
concerns voiced by host Bill Odle, a nearby landowner who is opposed
to the construction because it will negatively impact wildlife and
create "a false sense of security."

His attitude seemed to stand in stark contrast with the feelings of
some Americans in the borderlands who say the fence has been needed
for a long time to help stem the flow of illegal migration from Mexico.

Grijalva told reporters that after seeing the fence first hand, he
felt "overwhelmed" by the seriousness of the issue.

He said he is worried about plans to put a barrier across the San
Pedro River because of its consequences on wildlife and the environment.

He also questioned the fence's long-term effectiveness. He said the
fence will not be "the deterrent, the prevention or the real stoppage
of illegal entrants into this country."

People who staunchly oppose illegal immigration say the fence is
simply one element of a larger strategy to stop the flow of illegal
border crossings.

Grijalva, whose district has witnessed deadly clashes between rival
smugglers in the past year, remarked, "This is a corridor. People
will inevitably, if they have not already, find a way around, through
or over this construction."

His proposed legislation, the Borderlands Coservation and Security
Act of 2007, also known as HR 2593, would require the Department of
Homeland Security to consult with federal land managers and tribal
officials to create a strategy that supports both border security and
protects lands.

The legislation would provide for flexibility rather than a one-size-
fits-all approach to border security by allowing Homeland Security
experts to decide whether fences, virtual fences, border barriers or
other options are the best way to address border security.

Also, the legislation would require full public notice and
participation on border security decisions, as well as ensure the
government complies with laws protecting air, water, wildlife,
culture and health and safety. In addition, it would fund initiatives
that help mitigate damage to borderland habitat and wildlife.

Representatives of Defenders of Wildlife, the Sierra Club and the
Center for Biological Diversity accompanied Grijalva on the tour.

Matt Clark, southwest representative for Defenders of Wildlife, said
HR 2593 would "help to alleviate a lot of the conflict that is going
on here along the border."

Congress passed the Secure Fence Act in 2006, allowing for the
construction of a wall and fencing along much of the southern border.

Defenders of Wildlife and the Sierra Club filed a lawsuit and on Oct.
10 a federal district judge ordered a delay in the construction in
the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area because the
government failed to fully study the environmental impact of the
project.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff invoked his power under
the REAL ID Act on Oct. 22 to waive several laws to allow for the
construction to be restarted.

Grijalva said he disagrees with Chertoff's decision because he did
not study the land or consult with local land managers, and because
he used the REAL ID waiver.

"Right now, people think, 'Well, it's a good waiver because he built
a wall.' " Grijalva said. "Down the road, those waivers, I think, are
a threat to some of the basic public process transparencies that we
need in this country."

Contacted by phone on Monday, Veronica Nur Valdes, spokeswoman for
the Department of Homeland Security, said, "We stand by the
secretary's decision."

"After all, he did determine that any further delay in constructing
tactical infrastructure and fencing in the area would present a risk
to our nation's security," she said.

Chertoff feels the fence will be beneficial to the environment
because it will stop the traffic of illegal immigrants who leave
trash and human waste in areas, according to Nur Valdes.

The Department of Homeland Security is taking steps to prevent the
negative impacts on the environment. It agreed to work with a
qualified biologist regarding wildlife concerns. Also, temporary
vehicle barriers will be erected in the river that can be removed
during flood season, according to Nur Valdes.

Clark said wildlife will be able to get over and through the vehicle
barrier. But, he is concerned that the fence will funnel smuggling
and enforcement activity into the riparian corridor.

He is also concerned the fencing structures may cause the river bed
to shift. The fence may also increase sedimentation that could affect
endangered fish. The fence will also block wildlife from accessing
habitats across the border, he claimed.

On Nov. 1, Defenders of Wildlife and the Sierra Club filed a new
lawsuit saying Congress violated the Constitution by giving Chertoff
the authority to ignore the laws under the REAL ID Act.

According to Clark, the case will be reviewed by a judge at the
federal district court level.

"If she rules in favor of our position, that will fast-track this
case to the Supreme Court. If she doesn't allow the amended complaint
to move forward, it still may go to the Supreme Court, but it is less
likely the Supreme Court will entertain it," he said.

He is hopeful that the government will be required to remove some of
the fencing and mitigate environmental damage.

During one portion of the tour, Grijalva also made a stop along the
San Pedro River. Glenn Spencer, a neighboring landowner and president
of American Border Patrol, a nonprofit border-watch group, came by
and announced that it was against the law for the motor vehicles to
be in the sensitive riverine area.

"There are two signs posted all the way in here. 'No vehicles.'
'Authorized use only,' " said Spencer, who had parked outside the
zone and had hiked up to the group.

The congressman and environmentalists apologized for the faux pas.

"Do you know that this is where American Border Patrol smuggled
simulated weapons of mass destruction, up this river?" he continued.
"We took it all the way into Sierra Vista ... "

"This is one of the greatest threats to United States security, right
here — the San Pedro River."

Republican response

The president of the Arizona Senate, State Sen. Tim Bee of District
30, was sought for his reaction to the recent Democratic
Congressional tours of the border.

"I hope that it's effective, that it's more than a photo opportunity
for them, and that they will go back and get something done," said
Bee, who is exploring a possible challenge against Democratic U.S.
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords next fall.

Bee noted that he himself has "taken lawmakers to the border numerous
times."

He criticized the Congress for its inaction on immigration, and he
also said the state of Arizona continues to struggle with border issues.

Herald/Review reporter Jonathon Shacat can be reached at 515-4693 or
by e-mail at jonathon.shacat@bisbeereview.net.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Fwd: azmex gun trade



Begin forwarded message:


Date: November 9, 2007 12:48:46 PM MST

Subject: azmex gun trade

note;  This could be a response to a letter I wrote to editor couple months back.  Challenging the "authorities" to document where many of the arms originate, and
where in AZ one can get grenades, etc.  Still believe many of the cartel's arms come from Mex. govt. and these days perhaps from Venezuela
thx


"Yet the reality remains that second amendment rights in the US and those who defend them stand in the way of a robust solution to stop the arms that continue to flow from the US to Mexico."


Guns: The bloody US-Mexico market



Image: ISN

With over 2,100 deaths between January and October 2007 related to drug trafficking and the use of weapons purchased in the US, Mexico pins its hopes on the future success of the Merida Initiative to combat drug and gun trafficking.
By Sam Logan for ISN Security Watch (31/10/2007)
As news and rumors swirl around the current status and future success of the Merida Initiative, a plan to combat narco-trafficking in Mexico, those who argue the plan's merits can agree on at least one point: The front line of the so-called war on drugs has moved north from Colombia to the US-Mexican border, but the focus on drugs has overshadowed an element of the regional black market that is just as important.
Mexican authorities now estimate that during the administration of former Mexican president Vicente Fox (2000 to 2006), some 2,000 guns per day entered Mexico. That works out to about 1.4 guns per minute. During that same period, the Fox administration seized 8,088 guns of the estimated 4,380,000 that entered the country, representing 0.18 percent of all the arms illegally smuggled into Mexico over six years, according to Mexican daily La Reforma.
Reports from the Mexican Attorney General's office indicate that seized weapons are now more powerful and plentiful and traced weapons almost always lead back to the US.
Since the ban on assault weapons in the US was removed in 2004, Mexican criminals have demonstrably singled-out versions of the AK-47 and M-16 assault rifles, or AR-15s, as their preferred weapons.
What has been called an "iron river" of guns, ammunition and light weapons flows south into Mexico where organized crime hit men and others use them to combat Mexican military and police. The resulting body count has pressured the Mexican government to request additional help from Washington, whose leaders remain reticent to enact strict gun control legislation.
In a country where the right to own a weapon is staunchly preserved, at least one, maybe two gun shows are organized nearly every weekend of the year. Texas, Arizona and California are considered the three source states for a majority of the guns that are purchased and smuggled into Mexico. Preventing these guns from flowing south is a challenge that pits the second amendment rights of US citizens against the bloody battles and mounting numbers of Mexicans killed by weapons purchased in the US.
Ant-Trafficking
Gun shows in Arizona occur on most weekends. They are often organized by clubs and other groups such as the Arizona Arms Association, and are well within the law, which allows for private transactions between gun owners and citizens.
These transactions are not always closely monitored. It is often left up to the individual salesman to identify interested buyers who may be purchasing weapons for a third party. Known as "strawmen," these purchasers buy weapons for a commission of US$50-US$100 per purchase. Single-moms have been targeted for this seemingly benign service because they raise less suspicion.
"We try to tell our merchants to watch for signs of nervousness or see if someone is making multi-purchases," president of the Arizona Arms Association, Bob Litzman, told ISN Security Watch.
Using a network of such strawmen, Mexican gun traffickers can collect over a weekend dozens of weapons they then smuggle into Mexico typically over land routes with a line-up of cars carrying a smaller number of weapons across different border crossings.
This form of smuggling, where smaller groupings of guns are moved across the border is known as "ant trafficking," and is one of the primary reasons why it is difficult to detect weapons moving south from the US side of the border.
Back at the gun show, on the vendors' side of the table, private vendors often enter the business of becoming a supplier, taking orders in advance for delivery at a future date, likely an upcoming gun show. These individuals gather repeat clients and form the bulk of the supply source for weapons traffickers, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).
"Gang members and smugglers know which dealers to go to," ATF Senior Special Agent Tom Mangan told ISN Security Watch in a telephone interview from his office in Phoenix, Arizona.
"But we have had some cooperation from licensed dealers," Mangan said, adding, "[They are] motivated by those unlicensed dealers who cut into their profits."
Heading south
These salesmen and strawmen are the primary sources of illegal weapons flowing south, which they sell or hand off to gun traffickers who generally group the shipments at specific border crossings. Once in Mexico, weapons smugglers are set to make thousands on their merchandise.
"A used AK-47 may sell for around [US$] 400 and up," Litzman told ISN Security Watch. He added that an AR-15 could sell for US$800 to US$2,000, depending on the model and age of the weapon as well as other options such as the scope, stock or trigger guard.
Once in Mexico, these weapons are worth at least double those prices, and in some cases as much as triple or more, according to the ATF. One AK-47 purchased in Arizona for US$500 might go for as much as US$1,500 or more once it crosses the border.
At border crossings, Mexican customs agents are in the best position to detect smuggled weapons, but their situation is a difficult one. Many are given the well known choice of plata o plomo. "take the bribe or take a bullet." This is the clear message Mexican organized crime groups send those who patrol the Mexican side of border crossings, known as "plazas."
In February this year, a Mexican customs agent stopped a truck in Matamoros, a town across the border from Brownsville, Texas, under the control of Mexico's Gulf Cartel. The agent seized a load of weapons including 17 grenades, 18 rifles and 17 pistols. The next day he was killed with an AK-47.
The Mexican military, since its deployment to troubled spots in central and northern Mexico, has had some success seizing smuggled weapons. On 13 October, soldiers seized a weapons cache in central Tamaulipas state, located on the Mexico-Texas border. The public list of seized weapons included 11 AK-47 rifles, 13 AR-15 rifles and over 700 clips of ammunition. The Mexican daily El Milenio reported that one grenade launcher, powerful enough to destroy a tank, was also recovered.
But a review of Mexican reports reveals that such large seizures are limited. Finding weapons left at the scene of a crime is more common. Mexican officials have opined that hit men leave the weapons behind for two reasons: They do not want to be found with the weapons in the future and it is easy for them to obtain more.
Easy to get, hard to trace
Back in the US, where the Second Amendment upholds the gun shows that some consider a loop hole that facilitates weapons smuggling, the politics surrounding tracing and information sharing can be complicated, while the process of purchasing and required background checks has been streamlined.
Background checks are not always required at gun shows because most sales are considered to be made between two private, unlicensed individuals - not a licensed dealer and an individual, as would be the case in gun stores where a background check is mandatory.
The check itself is often quick and easy. When a customer is ready to close a sale, the merchant is required to call a hotline administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigations, where he gives the appropriate information to the person on the other end of the line. Most of the time this process takes less than five minutes. For years, the process took much longer, to the chagrin of gun shop owners, but over time has become streamlined and easy, according to Litzman.
Strawmen who purchase weapons from law abiding gun merchants are a gateway into the murky world of the grey market, where the guns reside until they are smuggled into Mexico and resold. Before the guns are handed out for criminal use, expert gunsmiths inspect working parts, clean the guns and make the necessary adjustments to turn a semi-automatic into a fully automatic assault weapon.
Once the strawman leaves the store with gun in hand, or leaves the fairgrounds in the case of a gun show, there is no way to trace the weapon until it is found at a crime scene or seized. Often times, weapons seized in Mexico trace back to gun stores in the US, but the only information the gun dealer must legally share is the information already approved by the background check itself. From there it is a dead end.
Tracing weapons captured in Mexico back to the US is itself a complicated process, one only allowed through the federal police headquarters in Mexico City. As a result, many weapons remain untraced because agents do not want to hassle with the bureaucracy.
There are over 200 million guns owned in the US. At any time any of these guns could be sold to men and women who will smuggle them to Mexico - some for personal use and self-defense and others for criminal use. The combination of such a massive supply with demand met by ant-trafficking creates a sea of possibilities, variables and actors in a country where the ATF and others have a limited set of legal tools and, more importantly, constitutional rights to respect and defend.
Solutions
The ATF has provided Mexican officials with technical assistance for tracing, but the manuals are currently in English, according to Mangan. He points out that the ATF is hopeful that future funding will allow for the manuals to be translated into Spanish, to place more agents on the border and an expansion of real-time intelligence sharing between the ATF and agents in Mexico.
Apart from the seemingly simple task of translating English to Spanish, the Merida Initiative promises to provide Mexican authorities with scanners. Placed up at key border crossings, these scanners can be set to detect drugs in traffic moving north and guns in traffic moving south.
Mangan is hopeful that the Merida Initiative will boost information sharing as well - something that to date has been lacking between agents due to concerns with corruption.
Yet the reality remains that second amendment rights in the US and those who defend them stand in the way of a robust solution to stop the arms that continue to flow from the US to Mexico.
On 29 October, the Washington Post reported that the Mexican government had seized from January to 21 October 2007 over 6,000 weapons, 470 grenades and 552,000 rounds of ammunition.
A former Mexican president, Jose de la Cruz Porfirio Diaz, mourned at the turn of the century that Mexico was "so far from God, and so close to the United States."
With over 2,100 deaths between January and October 2007 related to drug trafficking and the use of weapons purchased in the US, Mexico's geographical position, while difficult during the Mexican-American war, never has been more challenging than it is today.



Sam Logan is a Senior Political and Security Analyst at Riskline who has reported on security, energy, politics, economics, organized crime, terrorism and black markets in Latin America since 1999.